Is Pico Neo 3 Link better than Meta Quest 2?

The beta version of the Pico Neo 3 Link VR glasses has been available in Germany since the beginning of June. Price 449 euros with 256 GB of internal program memory. A Facebook account is also not necessary. This makes the standalone headset a direct competitor to the well-known Meta Quest 2 (formerly Oculus Quest 2), which is not officially available in Germany. While Barcelona-based creator Pico Interactive is geared more towards B2B use, it is now clearly gearing up for end users to play in virtual worlds.

Pico Neo 3 Link is a competitor of Quest 2 in the market

Barcelona-based Pico Interactive is probably no stranger to some of you. If you’re already familiar with the latest VR products, you don’t need to read any further. If you don’t know the name and have been interested in virtual reality for a while, you’ve come to the right place. Because Mark Zuckerberg recently raised the price of his hugely popular Meta Quest 2 VR glasses by US$100. This is quite unusual after two years of existence. But for a long time the project was funded by growing advertising revenue from Facebook aka Meta. Is Pico Neo 3 Link better than Meta Quest 2?Is Pico Neo 3 Link better than Meta Quest 2?Now it’s more or less over. Thus, competition encourages business. And that’s exactly what the Pico Neo 3 Link does for 449 euros.

But for that money you get a better equipped VR headset. Because the Pico is basically the same as the Neo 3 Pro, which is available from September 2021 for 599 euros. Focusing only on companies that integrate PC VR into their workflow to drive design reviews, virtual production, location-based entertainment and more. On the other hand, the Pico Neo 3 Link clearly focuses on the end user. This first manifests with wireless use and connection to the Pico VR Store with around 100 VR games.

You can save on expensive accessories with Pico

The helmet comes standard with an upgraded lockable wheel mount, which costs extra for the Meta with the Elite strap. A 5 meter long DP-Link cable (DisplayPort) is also included in delivery. While both VR glasses benefit from an octa-core Snapdragon XR2 processor clocked at 2.84 GHz and an Adreno 650 GPU (Graphics Processing Unit), the Pico Neo 3 Link has 6 GB of LPDDR4X RAM and 256 GB of UFS 3.0 program memory. With the Quest 2, you start at 64GB and always have the option of 128GB ($399) or 256GB ($499). The main memory is the same for both models.

Pico also depends on Android for the operating system. You can probably also install the apk file via sideload. When it comes to the display, Pico Glass has another advantage. The 5.5-inch LCD panel offers 4K resolution. That’s 3,664 x 1,920 pixels (1,832 x 1,920 per eye) at 72, 90, or 120 Hz. Meta Quest 2’s biggest hurdle is also related to pico glasses. battery. With the Meta just 3,640 mAh and 2 hours of gaming, the Pico 5,300 mAh offers up to 3 hours of gaming pleasure.

With DP-Link cable, VR glasses show their advantages

But you can feel a real boost with a wired connection via the supplied fiber optic cable with a powerful PC or laptop. Because then you have direct access to the VR Steam Store and an endless range of VR games. According to reports, image quality in games like Half-Life: Alex should be better than VR streaming via WiFi 6 and Quest 2. We have already requested a test status and will report back accordingly. Certainly in direct comparison with Quest 2.

[Quelle: Pressemitteilung]

Share the article:

Harry D. Gonzalez